Sermon on Romans Chapter 2:1-16 — highly recommended

Last Saturday night, Richard Wright delivered an excellent sermon on the first sixteen verses of Chapter 2, Paul’s letter to the Romans.

These are the verse (NIV):

You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things. Now we know that God’s judgment against those who do such things is based on truth. So when you, a mere man, pass judgment on them and yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God’s judgment? Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, tolerance and patience, not realizing that God’s kindness leads you toward repentance?

But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God’s wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed. God “will give to each person according to what he has done.”

To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile; but glory, honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For God does not show favoritism.

 All who sin apart from the law will also perish apart from the law, and all who sin under the law will be judged by the law. For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God’s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous. (Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law, since they show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts now accusing, now even defending them.) This will take place on the day when God will judge men’s secrets through Jesus Christ, as my gospel declares.”

These verses contain an important message to all those who think that by living a ‘good’ life that their efforts will enable them to escape God’s punishment.

Richard’s sermon goes for just over half-an-hour; a short period of time to take hold of – like a life raft in a stormy sea on a dark night. If you take Paul’s message to heart as articulate by Richard, and apply it to your life – it will lead you to eternal life!

Faith embraced in times of trouble

Browsing through the various internet news services I came across this title: ‘Faith embraced in times of trouble’(By John Stapleton, March 24, 2008, The Australian newspaper), I thought, well, that has long been the case.

Further into the article (follow the link for full details), I read the following: “In his homily during Easter Sunday mass at St Mary’s Cathedral in Sydney, Cardinal George Pell emphasised the broad appeal of his faith to a standing-room only congregation.

He was applauded when he welcomed a delegation of Muslims from the group Affinity Intercultural Foundation, which he said promoted “the worthy project” of friendship between the faiths.

“Christians don’t believe that Easter is for Christians only, as Catholics don’t believe that Easter only brings salvation to Catholics,” he said.

It brings about the possibility of eternal life for all good people. There are many rooms in the father’s house after death.”

Cardinal Pell urged everyone to be “agents for the spreading of goodness” and said that God’s grace was not limited by accidents of birth.

Let’s have a look at the quote Cardinal George Pell uses, regarding ‘there are many rooms in my Father’s house’. It comes from John’s Gospel, Chapter 14, now-  the context is that Jesus is talking to His disciples – not a crowd of visiting religious dignitaries, so the following verses provide the back drop to this statement; plus, I’ve included the verses that follow on, which also provided the setting for Jesus’ relationship with His Father (Verses 1-10, NIV):  ”Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God ; trust also in me. In my Father’s house are many rooms; if it were not so, I would have told you. I am going there to prepare a place for you (the disciples + followers of Jesus). And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. You know the way to the place where I am going.”

Thomas said to him, “Lord, we don’t know where you are going, so how can we know the way?”

Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.” (These key words are often passed over by many.)

Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.”

Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me?”

As you can see, Jesus words are directed to a specific group of people – His words were not directed at a general crowd of diverse peoples!

Next, let us look at the words ‘the possibility of eternal life for all good people’. For this, we can go to Luke 18:18-19 (NIV): “A certain ruler asked him (Jesus), “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”  “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone.”

The sad outcome is that Jesus said that there are no good people, so for everyone who does not qualify as ‘good’ (and no one does); and, they are not subject to the mercy of God through Jesus (I use these words to cover both ‘belief in Jesus’ and ‘His sovereign will’ on whom He will have mercy on): then there is no possibility of eternal life – now that’s a bit different to what Cardinal George Pell implies – don’t you think?

Global South Synod statement on Anglican Lambeth Conference 2008

I found this statement (made by the SYNOD of the Province of the Anglican Church in South East Asia, meeting in Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, 27 – 28 February 2008) to be a very balanced view on the Anglican Lambeth Conference 2008 - which gave, good reasons (in my view) why Global South Bishops should attend the Conference. 

In particular, I think this point (10) should be prayerfully re-considered by other ‘orthodox’ Archbishops and Bishops who are currently not going to this conference:

“10. CONSIDERED the need to provide strong active participation in the discussion and debate on the acceptance and adoption of the proposed Anglican Covenant at Lambeth 2008, and thereafter, to expeditiously and definitively conclude the task of defining and explicating publicly the common standard of faith and order, proper accountability and discipline within the Anglican Communion;

What do you think?

Can you prove that you are a Christian?

I like this article (short and to the point), “Could you prove you’re a Christian?” written by Keith Manuel  (Mar 18, 2008), taken from a Baptist site.

Here’s the introduction: “A recent article in The New York Times discussed the difficulty facing some American-born Jews, now living in Israel, to prove the authenticity of their heritage. One young woman went with her fiancé to the Tel Aviv Rabbinate to register to marry. This governmental court asked her to prove she was Jewish.

If a court of law asked you to prove you were a Christian, how would you do it?”

(The link above, should take you to the full article.)

The facts

I’ve just read an interesting article about Christianity in USA – “According to the study, 78.4% of Americans are Christians, about 5% belong to other faith traditions and 16.1% are unaffiliated with any religion.”

If 78% of Americans are Christians; how do you explain the lack of political honesty, health provision, homelessness, violence and ‘reckless’ media (TV shows and other news media)?

Truth and myth

Filipino Devotees Honor Jesus Statue, By HRVOJE HRANJSKI, Associated Press Writer, Full story here, January 9, 2007

Here is an extract: “MANILA, Philippines – Tens of thousands (of) barefoot Filipino Catholic devotees jostled for a chance to touch a black statue of Jesus in an annual procession Wednesday, seeking blessings or forgiveness for their sins.  …

Many believe the life-sized wooden figure, brought by Spanish missionaries from Mexico in 1606, holds mystical powers that can wash away sins or cure illnesses. The missionaries’ ship caught fire and the statue was burned but survived as a testament to the Philippines’ unique brand of Catholicism that combines folk superstitions in Asia’s most populous Christian nation.”

The isssue is that Jesus, our God, has already washed away sin. This problem must be dealt with by Catholic teachers, there can be no doubt that folk superstitions are a form of idolatry, and must never be combined with the way, and the truth. There can be no compromise – just as the bronze serpent was smashed, so too black statues of Jesus must also be smashed – for the same reason.

What do you think?

 

There are double standards and double standards …

There is an article on the Religious Intelligence site  “Double standards’ over gays”  Tuesday, 8th January 2008. 5:39pm, By: George Conger

Which reports: “The Church of England is not being honest about the issue of homosexuality, US Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori has told the BBC Radio 4’s PM programme.

The failure of other Anglican Churches to be honest about the non-celibate homosexual bishops and clergy active in their churches was ‘certainly a difficulty in our context’ in the US, she said. “There’s certainly a double standard.” Bishop Schori urged the Anglican Communion to follow America’s moral high road. “The Episcopal Church lives in a society that values transparency,” she said, and others should follow the its lead and not be ashamed to question Scripture and the Church’s historic teachings.

Bishop Jefferts Schori goes on to say, (we should) ‘bring these issues out into the public sphere where we can do public theologizing about them.

It was unfair to single out the American Church for permitting same-sex blessings, when other churches were turning a blind eye to the practice, Bishop Schori said. “Those services are happening in various places, including in the Church of England, where my understanding is that there are far more of them happening than there are in the Episcopal Church,” she said.

These are interesting claims made by the US Presiding Bishop.  I would think that there has been endless public-theologizing about these issues.  In addition, there are many (& have been many in the past) who unashamedly question Scripture and the Church’s historic teachings - however, some may say that the American Church is perhaps a few centuries behind those who were first active in this area.

One comment which jumps off the screen is that the Bishop ‘urged the Anglican Communion to follow America’s moral high road.’  The issue which the Bishop needs to address is, that outside of the USA and Canada, there would be little in the way of support for this somewhat humorous statement.

In summary, if you believe that the Bible represents unchanging spiritual truths. If you believe that God actually knows the future and what He wrote through His prophets and apostles reflects His perfect knowledge of all things – past, present and future.  Then the US Presiding Bishop must develop a new gospel and new theology to match the moral high ground upon which the American Church is building its future. It is indeed a different standard – but one of countless many, which have gone before and fallen.

Comments

I don’t mind what sort of comments people send – as long as it’s not spam.

A suggestion some may like to consider. Please save your time and don’t send anti-Christian material – I’ll just delete it 

Before my conversion I looked at most other frameworks of structured human thought/philosophy (inc. zen & humanism). At one time, I was a leading exponent of Sartrean existentialism, coming from the ranks of Nietzsche’s would-be supermen, having left behind the ruins of nihilism. I see all these other attempts to explain the meaning of life, as meaningless mazes that have no exit points. A chasing after the wind. (Please pardon the puns and poor wordplay  :) )

Yes, that’s correct – I have a closed mind about the issue – check out my history on tofollowJesus.org and you will understand why!

A new year

A conservative group of anglican archbishops, bishops and others, are organising a Global Anglican Future Conference (GAFCON) to be held in the Holy Land in June 2008. I guess the main outcome would be a road-map for conservative Anglicans, post the pending split in the Anglican Communion.  [Perhaps, regarding the schism - it's more accurate to say while we wait for official recognition of the existing de facto parting of the ways.]

A pro-gay website contains this wonderful quote: “GAFCON is an event for the like-minded. A gathering of the like-minded is very specifically not a Christian ideal nor part of the teaching of Jesus Christ.”

Depending on the subject of the ‘like-mindedness’  – it could be a core teaching of Jesus – such is the problem of these catchy generalisations – they are usually exceptionally wrong.

The Centurion’s Faith by Richard Wright

The Centurion’s Faith; Luke 7: 1-10

A Centurion’s servant was seriously ill. Matthew’s gospel says that he was paralysed.  Whatever the nature of the illness, he was about to die. The centurion sent some Jewish elders to see Jesus and ask him to heal him. When Jesus approached the home of the centurion some friends came with a message that the centurion considered himself unworthy to have Jesus enter his house. But the centurion was a man who was under authority and exercised authority. He understood the authority that Jesus had and that it came from God. If Jesus spoke the word then the servant would be healed. And that is what happened.

Jesus declared that he had not yet seen such faith, even in Israel. A simple story, but with a few strange elements to it. Let’s deal with a few apparent anomalies first. These events were also described by Matthew in chapter 8 of his Gospel. But there a couple of differences. In Matthew’s gospel we read that the centurion spoke to Jesus personally. But this isn’t really a problem. Matthew and Luke had different emphases in their stories. And even today when an emissary is sent on behalf of someone, the most common occurrence is when an ambassador speaks on behalf of a government, whether it is the emissary or the person who sent him, who speaks is immaterial.

In this case it doesn’t matter that Matthew says it was the centurion who spoke, because the Jewish elders in Luke’s account are not speaking their own words, but supposedly those of the centurion. The second strange thing about this story is this. In verse 3 we read that the elders asked Jesus to come and heal the servant. But before Jesus could get to the house some friends of the centurion came with another message suggesting that Jesus not enter the house, in verse 6.

There are two possible explanations. Perhaps the Jewish elders did not give the original message as they had been asked. If the centurion had told the elders to ask Jesus to heal the servant they could easily have interpreted his request as come and heal, and that is what they passed on to Jesus. Alternatively, the centurion could have had a change of heart. And this seems, to me, to be more likely. He had heard about Jesus, and he must have heard that Jesus had come to Capernaum. So he asked some Jewish elders to take his request to Jesus. But upon reflection he decided that Jesus should not enter his house.

And for a number of reasons he would suggest that Jesus not enter his house. The first reason is that Jesus was a Jew and the centurion was a gentile. A Jew entering a gentile’s house would become unclean under Jewish law. And the centurion was both aware of, and to some extent sympathetic to, the Jewish law; in verse 5 we read that he had built a synagogue. The second reason is the one that is presented here. The centurion considered himself unworthy to have Jesus in his house, and because of the authority which Jesus had, it was not necessary for him to be there. And this is what this passage is really all about.

Let’s take a closer look at the centurion. The word centurion literally means one in charge of a hundred men but it roughly conforms to a current army company. A centurion is much like a modern day captain or major, a senior field officer, one who commands soldiers on the battle ground. The New Testament always speaks well of centurions. This itself is surprising because the Romans were not well received by the Jews, as is the case of any occupying force. And we see this today, almost everyday, on our television news programs when we see of new outbreaks of violence often aimed at the occupying forces in Iraq. And it stands to reason, no one likes invaders taking over their land. But this centurion appeared to be well liked, or at least respected. The elders in verse 4 pleaded earnestly. “This man deserves to have you do this because he loves our nation and has built our synagogue.”

So the question arises, did Jesus heal the centurion’s servant because the centurion deserved it, as the elders attested? Verse 6 may imply this with the word so. But this may mean that Jesus went, not as a result of the centurion’s deserving the healing, but as a result of the request of the elders. But in Matthew’s account we read in Matt 8: 13, Jesus said “Go! It will be done just as you believed it would.” So it seems that it isn’t the worthiness of the centurion that matters. What was important was that the centurion asked and Jesus, for whatever reason, answered his request. And we cannot assume that it was because of the centurion’s deservedness, nor even because of his faith, although that is the crux of the story and we will get to it in a moment.

But look down at the next section of this chapter, from verses 11 to 17. Here the only son of a widow had died and was being carried out of the town. The mother was obviously distressed and she was weeping, as you would expect. There is no mention here of her faith, or of her asking anything of Jesus. But verse 13 says “When the Lord saw her , his heart went out to her.” He then approached the dead man and told him to get up. And immediately the dead man came back to life and sat up and began to speak.

In this case Jesus gave the man back his life because he chose to. It was an act of pure grace without any human intervention. And this is the nature of the power of God. He exercises his saving power, or his healing power when and where he chooses. Sometimes, as in the case of the centurion, as an answer to prayer, sometimes, as we also see with the centurion, it appears to be as a result of faith. In the case of the widow’s son we can find no reason at all, except that Jesus wanted to. Whether we think there is a reason or not, the ultimate reason is that God has chosen to pour out his grace upon us. So Jesus decided that he would go to the centurion and heal his servant. But on the way friends of the centurion intercept with the message found in verses 6 to 8.

This is an extraordinary message for a number of reasons. First, the centurion declares that he does not deserve to have Jesus come under his roof. He says that he is not worthy. He was not even worthy to speak to Jesus in person. We would expect it to be the other way round, that the centurion would consider that Jesus, a small town rabbi in a troublesome far off part of the Roman Empire, would not be worthy to enter the centurion’s house. Secondly, this gentile pagan has a profound understanding of the power and authority of Jesus. Remember, this is early in Jesus ministry. No one had seen Jesus perform miracles at a distance before.

In chapter 4 we see the beginning of Jesus’ healing ministry. He went to the home of Peter’s mother in law and healed her. In verse 40 we read “When the sun was setting the people brought to Jesus all who had various kinds of sickness, and laying hands on each one, he healed them.” And even later, in chapter 8 Jesus heals a woman who had been bleeding for twelve years. She came and touched his cloak and was healed. In verse 46 Jesus says “Someone touched me; I know that power has gone out from me.”

All the indications were that Jesus needed to be with the person to heal them. Now today, with all the scriptures available to us, and a multitude of scholars behind us, we know that that is not the case. But prior to the centurion, no one had suggested that Jesus could heal from a distance. How did he know? He knew because of the third extraordinary statement that he made in verse 8. He declares that he is a man under authority but then goes on to explain how he is a man in authority. “I tell this one, ‘Go,’ and he goes; and that one, ‘Come,’ and he comes. I say to my servant, ‘Do this,’ and he does it.”

The centurion could exercise authority because he was under authority. His men would not go or come or do this just on his say so. They did it because his authority over them was based upon him being under the authority of the emperor. So when he gave an order, it was the same as the emperor giving the order. The centurion understood that Jesus’ authority came from God. So when he spoke it was the same as God speaking. And if he tells a disease to go, it goes.

There is a verse in the Bible that everyone knows, but few of us really believe. It is Genesis 1: 3: And God said, “Let there be light”, and there was light. This verse set the pattern for all that was to come in scripture. When God speaks things happen. If God can speak everything to come into existence out of nothing, then why do we not believe that he has authority over everything else? But the centurion did believe this. He knew that Jesus spoke with the authority of God. He didn’t know all the doctrine associated with the Trinity or the incarnation, or Jesus’ relationship with his Father. He didn’t need to. He did know that Jesus spoke for God, and that God had power over disease. So if Jesus speaks the word
then his servant would be healed. What could be simpler?

But things are even better for us. After Jesus died on the cross and rose again he told his disciples in Matthew 28: 18 “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.”Finally Jesus said in verse 9: “I tell you, I have not found such great faith even in Israel.” The Jews knew that all power and authority vested in God. But that authority has now been given to Jesus. The centurion recognised that as did Paul when he wrote to the Philippians: “At the name of Jesus every knee should bow in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father.”

[This is the text of a sermon, Richard gave in February 2007. In it, Richard gives a really good outline of God's grace in action and also covers the important point that God's authority has been given to Jesus. I think it's an excellent semon on this topic - one of the best I've seen.]